Autogenerated HTML docs for v1.5.6.2-212-g08b5
diff --git a/gittutorial.txt b/gittutorial.txt index 036a27c..e71b561 100644 --- a/gittutorial.txt +++ b/gittutorial.txt
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ directory created, named ".git". Next, tell git to take a snapshot of the contents of all files under the -current directory (note the '.'), with `git-add`: +current directory (note the '.'), with 'git-add': ------------------------------------------------ $ git add . @@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ This snapshot is now stored in a temporary staging area which git calls the "index". You can permanently store the contents of the index in the -repository with `git-commit`: +repository with 'git-commit': ------------------------------------------------ $ git commit @@ -85,15 +85,15 @@ ------------------------------------------------ You are now ready to commit. You can see what is about to be committed -using `git-diff` with the --cached option: +using 'git-diff' with the --cached option: ------------------------------------------------ $ git diff --cached ------------------------------------------------ -(Without --cached, `git-diff` will show you any changes that +(Without --cached, 'git-diff' will show you any changes that you've made but not yet added to the index.) You can also get a brief -summary of the situation with `git-status`: +summary of the situation with 'git-status': ------------------------------------------------ $ git status @@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ This will again prompt you for a message describing the change, and then record a new version of the project. -Alternatively, instead of running `git-add` beforehand, you can use +Alternatively, instead of running 'git-add' beforehand, you can use ------------------------------------------------ $ git commit -a @@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ Many revision control systems provide an `add` command that tells the system to start tracking changes to a new file. Git's `add` command -does something simpler and more powerful: `git-add` is used both for new +does something simpler and more powerful: 'git-add' is used both for new and newly modified files, and in both cases it takes a snapshot of the given files and stages that content in the index, ready for inclusion in the next commit. @@ -316,7 +316,7 @@ ------------------------------------------------ With this, Alice can perform the first operation alone using the -`git-fetch` command without merging them with her own branch, +'git-fetch' command without merging them with her own branch, using: ------------------------------------- @@ -324,7 +324,7 @@ ------------------------------------- Unlike the longhand form, when Alice fetches from Bob using a -remote repository shorthand set up with `git-remote`, what was +remote repository shorthand set up with 'git-remote', what was fetched is stored in a remote tracking branch, in this case `bob/master`. So after this: @@ -368,7 +368,7 @@ /home/alice/project ------------------------------------- -(The complete configuration created by `git-clone` is visible using +(The complete configuration created by 'git-clone' is visible using `git config -l`, and the linkgit:git-config[1] man page explains the meaning of each option.) @@ -398,7 +398,7 @@ ----------------- Git history is represented as a series of interrelated commits. We -have already seen that the `git-log` command can list those commits. +have already seen that the 'git-log' command can list those commits. Note that first line of each git log entry also gives a name for the commit: @@ -411,7 +411,7 @@ merge-base: Clarify the comments on post processing. ------------------------------------- -We can give this name to `git-show` to see the details about this +We can give this name to 'git-show' to see the details about this commit. ------------------------------------- @@ -469,13 +469,13 @@ Be careful with that last command: in addition to losing any changes in the working directory, it will also remove all later commits from this branch. If this branch is the only branch containing those -commits, they will be lost. Also, don't use `git-reset` on a +commits, they will be lost. Also, don't use 'git-reset' on a publicly-visible branch that other developers pull from, as it will force needless merges on other developers to clean up the history. -If you need to undo changes that you have pushed, use `git-revert` +If you need to undo changes that you have pushed, use 'git-revert' instead. -The `git-grep` command can search for strings in any version of your +The 'git-grep' command can search for strings in any version of your project, so ------------------------------------- @@ -484,7 +484,7 @@ searches for all occurrences of "hello" in v2.5. -If you leave out the commit name, `git-grep` will search any of the +If you leave out the commit name, 'git-grep' will search any of the files it manages in your current directory. So ------------------------------------- @@ -494,7 +494,7 @@ is a quick way to search just the files that are tracked by git. Many git commands also take sets of commits, which can be specified -in a number of ways. Here are some examples with `git-log`: +in a number of ways. Here are some examples with 'git-log': ------------------------------------- $ git log v2.5..v2.6 # commits between v2.5 and v2.6 @@ -504,7 +504,7 @@ # Makefile ------------------------------------- -You can also give `git-log` a "range" of commits where the first is not +You can also give 'git-log' a "range" of commits where the first is not necessarily an ancestor of the second; for example, if the tips of the branches "stable-release" and "master" diverged from a common commit some time ago, then @@ -523,13 +523,13 @@ will show the list of commits made on the stable branch but not the experimental branch. -The `git-log` command has a weakness: it must present commits in a +The 'git-log' command has a weakness: it must present commits in a list. When the history has lines of development that diverged and -then merged back together, the order in which `git-log` presents +then merged back together, the order in which 'git-log' presents those commits is meaningless. Most projects with multiple contributors (such as the linux kernel, -or git itself) have frequent merges, and `gitk` does a better job of +or git itself) have frequent merges, and 'gitk' does a better job of visualizing their history. For example, ------------------------------------- @@ -549,7 +549,7 @@ $ git diff v2.5:Makefile HEAD:Makefile.in ------------------------------------- -You can also use `git-show` to see any such file: +You can also use 'git-show' to see any such file: ------------------------------------- $ git show v2.5:Makefile
